Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 1/25/1982

Salama v. Virginia

Citations

  • 455 U.S. 928
  • 102 S. Ct. 1296
  • 71 L. Ed. 2d 474
  • 50 U.S.L.W. 3592
  • 1982 U.S. LEXIS 764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendants argued that the cotut lacked in personam jurisdiction based on the FSIA admiralty provision and improper service of process
  • same, under former §§ 596-597

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Salama v. Virginia

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.