Skip to main content
· 3/3/1977

Federal Case

Citations

  • 549 F.2d 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “corporate conduct which is compelled by a foreign sovereign” is treated as “if it were an act of the state itself.”
  • “Particularly in the field of trade regulation, American laws may not be duplicated by the other nation. That does not necessarily indicate a ‘conflict,’ however, since non-prohibition does not always mean affirmative approval.”
  • defense attacking commerce allegations is not jurisdictional, but on merits
  • defense attacking commerce allegations is not jurisdictional, but on merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.