Skip to main content

Uchitel v. F. R. Tripler & Co.

Citations

  • 107 Misc. 2d 310
  • 434 N.Y.S.2d 77
  • 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 933
  • 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding tender as defined in section 2-503 does not require actual physical handing over of goods
  • “All that is needed for proper tender under current law is that the less rigorous requirements of section 2-503 — holding the goods at the buyer’s disposition and giving him reasonable notice— be fulfilled”
  • “To argue that … accrual does not occur until a proper tender is made, would be to substitute in place of [the] four year limitation period a statute of non-limitation and allow the buyer a perpetuity in which to bring suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.