Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 10/21/1980
Uchitel v. F. R. Tripler & Co.
Citations
- 107 Misc. 2d 310
- 434 N.Y.S.2d 77
- 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 933
- 1980 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2883
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding tender as defined in section 2-503 does not require actual physical handing over of goods
- “All that is needed for proper tender under current law is that the less rigorous requirements of section 2-503 — holding the goods at the buyer’s disposition and giving him reasonable notice— be fulfilled”
- “To argue that … accrual does not occur until a proper tender is made, would be to substitute in place of [the] four year limitation period a statute of non-limitation and allow the buyer a perpetuity in which to bring suit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.