Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa Barbara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an implied warranty, by its very nature, cannot explicitly extend to future performance
• the ‘continuing course of treatment’ doctrine is applicable “even if there are no further acts of malpractice in the continued treatment”
• the `continuing course of treatment' doctrine is applicable \even if there are no further acts of malpractice in the continued treatment\
• the ‘continuing course of treatment’ doctrine is applicable “even if there are no further acts of malpractice in the continued treatment”
• “the terms ‘explicit’ and ‘implied’ are contradictory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).