H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that parties are not required to authenticate documents at summary judgment stage where no challenge to authenticity raised
• stating that Rule 56 “does not . . . require that parties authenticate documents where [the non-offering party] did not challenge the authenticity of the documents”
• stating that “hearsay testimony ... that would not be admissible if testified to at the trial may not properly be set forth in [a Rule 56] affidavit”
• hearsay testimony that would be inadmissible at trial “may not properly be set forth in a Rule 56(e) affidavit”
• Rule 56 does not require parties to authenticate documents “where appellee did not challenge the authenticity of the documents in the district court.”
• Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(e) “does not, as appellee suggests, require that parties authenticate documents where appellee did not challenge the authenticity of the documents in the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).