Skip to main content
· 2/4/1982

Ramirez v. Autosport

Citations

  • 440 A.2d 1345
  • 88 N.J. 277
  • 33 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 134
  • 1982 N.J. LEXIS 1875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing evolution of perfect tender rule in UCC and rejection of contract law concept of substantial performance
  • referring to the \equitable doctrine of restitution the purpose of which is to restore plaintiff to as good a position as he occupied before the contract\
  • referring to the \equitable doctrine of restitution the purpose of which is to restore plaintiff to as good a position as he occupied before the contract\
  • “[t]he Code eschews the word ‘rescission’ and substitutes . . . ‘revocation of acceptance’ ”
  • \[t]he Code eschews the word `rescission' and substitutes . . . `revocation of acceptance'\
  • before acceptance, the buyer may reject goods for any nonconformity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pollock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.