Elysee v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the petitioner did not raise “even a colorable ... question of law” where he merely “attack[ed] ... the factual findings made and the balancing of factors engaged in by the IJ”
• concluding that claims that IJ disregarded certain factors and overvalued others did not raise colorable constitutional or legal questions
• holding that attacks on the balancing of factors engaged in by the IJ before deciding not to grant discretionary relief were not constitutional claims or questions of law
• holding that a petition for review based on “the IJ’s supposed ‘complete[ ] disregard[ ]’ for the hardships that will be faced by [petitioner’s] children if he is deported” raised no question of law
• finding no colorable constitutional claim or question of law where petitioner argued that IJ “complete[ly] disregard[ed]” the relevant hardships that would be faced by his children if he were deported
• finding no colorable constitutional claim or question of law where petitioner argued that the IJ “completely] disregard[ed]” the relevant hardships that would be faced by his children if he were deported

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).