Rohrbaugh v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating in a footnote that the majority of courts addressing the issue have adopted the Restatement's position on damages for an invasion of privacy claim
• adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts’ (1977) position on damages for invasion of privacy claim and, additionally, holding that if none of the Restatement damages are proven, nominal compensatory damages are to be awarded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).