Turner v. Turner
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2200
Syllabus
Duhart. By failing to rule on motion for guardianship, trial court is presumed to have denied it. Also, trial court: (1) equitably, but not equally, divided marital property (2) properly divided marital property before making an award of spousal support (3) considered necessary factors in awarding spousal support and (4) did not violate due process in denying appellant's motion for continuance.
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court· 1964-05-04· cited 1,845×
- Booth v. BoothOhio Supreme Court· 1989-07-26· cited 1,162×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- Cherry v. CherryOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 872×
- Kunkle v. KunkleOhio Supreme Court· 1990-05-09· cited 595×
- Kostelnik v. HelperOhio Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 349×
- Martin v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 1985-07-24· cited 298×
- Bowen v. BowenOhio Court of Appeals· 1999-02-09· cited 179×
- King v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-26· cited 5×
- McMillan v. McMillanOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.