Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/26/2019

King v. King

Citations

2019 Ohio 1561

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding spousal support to appellee. R.C. 3105.18 all income pension retirement impute retroactive arrearage.

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Salpietro v. Salpietro
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-20· cited 14×
Turner v. Turner
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-07· cited 4×
Pearson v. Pearson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-04· cited 2×
Norton v. Norton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-25· cited 1×
Eberly v. Eberly
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Kunkle v. Kunkle
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-05-09· cited 595×
Kaechele v. Kaechele
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-02-10· cited 574×
Bowen v. Bowen
Ohio Court of Appeals· 1999-02-09· cited 179×
MacDonald v. MacDonald
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-20· cited 8×
Burkart v. Burkart
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2007-08-02· cited 7×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.