Brunson v. Brunson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding two of father’s life insurance policies naming husband as sole beneficiary were not marital property but the third, funds from which had been commingled into family business, was marital property
• holding two of father’s life insurance policies naming husband as sole beneficiary were not marital property but the third, funds from which had been commingled into family business, was marital property
• \When tracing yields only ambiguous results the property is typically treated as marital.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).