Turner v. Turner
Citations
- 80 Cal. 141
- 22 P. 72
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 878
Syllabus
<p>Divorce—Alimony—Counsel Fees — Discretion.—In an action for a divorce, the court has discretion to require the husband to pay alimony and counsel fees to the wife pending the suit; but such discretion is not an arbitrary power, and must be exercised in view of the circumstances and necessities of the several parties, and the pecuniary ability of the husband. Held, that, under the circumstances of this case, the allowance of fifty dollars a month alimony, and five hundred dollars counsel fees was excessive, and an abuse of discretion, the defendant’s burdens and necessities being greater, and his means and ability to sustain them being less, than are the plaintiff’s.</p>
Judges: Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Loeb v. LoebCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-03-02· cited 34×
- Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1946-06-21· cited 30×
- Mudd v. MuddCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-05-20· cited 27×
- Fallon v. FallonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-07-26· cited 20×
- Haddon v. HaddonSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-06-15· cited 11×
- Howton v. HowtonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1942-04-20· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Surry v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1913-08-12· cited 8×
- Loke v. LokeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-04-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.