Court of Appeals of Virginia· 6/16/1992
Turner v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 420 S.E.2d 235
- 14 Va. App. 737
- 8 Va. Law Rep. 3558
- 1992 Va. App. LEXIS 169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the term “‘[f]orthwith’ is a practical and flexible standard which must conform to the necessities of circumstances”
- finding an eleven day delay reasonable where officers followed department policy by not executing warrant when defendant not present
- \[T]he question whether the police officers complied with the `forthwith' requirement necessarily entails a determination whether probable cause continued to exist at the time the warrant was executed....\
- “[T]he question whether the police officers complied with the ‘forthwith’ requirement necessarily entails a determination whether probable cause continued to exist at the time the warrant was executed.... ”
- “[O]xycodone, also known as Percocet, [is] a Schedule II controlled substance.”
- eleven-day delay in executing warrant for contraband in residence permissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Najee Finique Hairston v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2017-04-11· cited 81×
- Tart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-11-23· cited 46×
- Henry v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-06-13· cited 21×
- Maye v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-11-30· cited 20×
- Hicks v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2011-03-04· cited 15×
- Whitaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2001-10-16· cited 7×
- Felton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-03-23· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. MossCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-06-19· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. LagundinoSpotsylvania County Circuit Court· 1995-04-19· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. BrightCharlottesville County Circuit Court· 2000-02-29
- Commonwealth v. HoverstadtSouthampton County Circuit Court· 2000-09-15
- Commonwealth v. RoyRichmond County Circuit Court· 2001-06-11
- Commonwealth v. LoganRoanoke County Circuit Court· 2006-08-08
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 1,306×
- Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1986-06-13· cited 272×
- Derr v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1991-11-08· cited 214×
- United States v. Garcia, Appeal of Jose A. Figueroa-Rivera, Gabriel Grant, Celina Wilson-GrantSecond Circuit· 1989-08-15· cited 170×
- Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-10· cited 153×
- United States v. Murrell BedfordThird Circuit· 1975-07-15· cited 133×
- United States v. Robert P. McCallFourth Circuit· 1984-08-17· cited 121×
- Jones v. ConwellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1984-03-09· cited 113×
- United States v. James L. HarperFifth Circuit· 1971-10-25· cited 108×
- United States v. Edward DunningsSecond Circuit· 1970-03-23· cited 98×
- United States v. Delbert Bowling (89-5595), and Idell Bowling (89-5618)Sixth Circuit· 1990-04-09· cited 74×
- Saunders v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1977-09-01· cited 55×
- Horne v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1986-01-17· cited 49×
- Huff v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1973-03-05· cited 48×
- United States v. Calvin ClarkThird Circuit· 1970-04-30· cited 46×
- United States v. Gloria Jean Nepstead and John Edward AshNinth Circuit· 1970-05-08· cited 35×
- State v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1980-09-30· cited 30×
- United States v. Melvin LemmonsSixth Circuit· 1976-02-13· cited 23×
- Donaldson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-10-08· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.