Supreme Court of Virginia· 9/1/1977
Saunders v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 218 Va. 294
- 237 S.E.2d 150
- 1977 Va. LEXIS 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a magistrate may deem eyewitness information found in a search warrant’s affidavit reliable because the affidavit is based on firsthand knowledge
- a magistrate may infer the reliability of a search warrant affidavit, which discloses information from an eyewitness to the fact related, because the affidavit is based on firsthand knowledge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Derr v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1991-11-08· cited 214×
- Schmitt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 2000-06-08· cited 109×
- Waye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1979-01-12· cited 95×
- Joyce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-08-10· cited 60×
- Albert v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-08-19· cited 57×
- Com. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Virginia· 2008-06-06· cited 40×
- Garza v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1984-11-30· cited 40×
- Wise v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1985-11-27· cited 38×
- Stotler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-07-01· cited 33×
- Kitze v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1993-09-17· cited 29×
- Polston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-05-27· cited 28×
- State v. GomesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-01-08· cited 23×
- Turner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-06-16· cited 22×
- Hodges v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-06-07· cited 20×
- Maye v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-11-30· cited 20×
- Lowe v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Virginia· 2004-09-17· cited 19×
- Martinez v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-08-14· cited 18×
- Hamer v. School Board of the City of ChesapeakeSupreme Court of Virginia· 1990-06-08· cited 18×
- Maxey v. HubbleSupreme Court of Virginia· 1989-11-10· cited 17×
- David Gregory Landeck v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2012-03-13· cited 15×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- United States v. Martin F. BurkeSecond Circuit· 1975-05-15· cited 262×
- United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern BeasleyFifth Circuit· 1972-04-21· cited 155×
- United States v. David Ross MileySecond Circuit· 1975-03-19· cited 125×
- George McCreary v. Maurice SiglerEighth Circuit· 1969-03-07· cited 116×
- People v. GlaubmanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1971-06-01· cited 81×
- United States v. Richard Floyd McCoy Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1973-05-07· cited 63×
- Simmons v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1977-01-14· cited 61×
- United States v. Ernest Eugene MahlerNinth Circuit· 1971-07-09· cited 60×
- United States v. Herman P. Unger, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 1973-01-02· cited 58×
- Manley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1970-09-04· cited 57×
- United States v. Andrew J. WelebirFourth Circuit· 1974-06-06· cited 53×
- Schaum v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1975-01-20· cited 50×
- Huff v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1973-03-05· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.