Huszar v. Gross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “remarks” of a government attorney relating to a possible action by the comptroller’s office are privileged
• “[N]umerous cases . . . confirm that trial courts, upon motions to dismiss, routinely make decisions as to whether a privilege applies to protect an allegedly defamatory statement.” (alterations added; collecting cases)
• republication of matters asserted by government officials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).