Hope v. NAT. ALLIANCE, JACKSONVILLE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “courts have not imposed a strict relevancy test in determining whether a statement made in the judicial process is entitled to immunity” in “recognition of the necessity of providing for the free flow of information”
• noting that “courts have not imposed a strict relevancy test in determining whether a statement made in the judicial process is entitled to immunity” in “recognition of the necessity of providing for the free flow of information”
• holding statements made during course of grievance procedure absolutely privileged
• allegedly defamatory statements made in course of collective bargaining grievance process when made in connection to the quasi-judicial proceeding are absolutely privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).