Skip to main content

Trotter v. State

Citations

  • 543 P.2d 1023
  • 218 Kan. 266
  • 1975 Kan. LEXIS 542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While we do not approve of any failure to comply strictly with the explicitly stated requirements of K.S.A. 22-3210, it does not follow that eveiy deviation therefrom requires reversal.”
  • failure to strictly comply with 22-3210 is harmless if, upon review of the entire record, it can be determined the pleas were knowingly and voluntarily made
  • failure to strictly comply with 22-3210 is harmless if, upon review of the entire record, it can be determined the pleas were knowingly and voluntarily made
  • failure to strictly comply with 22-3210 is harm less if, upon review of the entire record, it can be determined that the pleas were laiowingly and voluntarily made
  • failure to comply with K.S.A. 22-3210 was harmless error, but disapproving of any failure to fully comply with K.S.A. 22-3210 since full compliance protects the accused’s due process guarantees
  • \The appellant was 34 years old and no stranger to the criminal justice system. Less than a year had passed since he had been released on parole after serving six years on a sentence for felony offenses similar to those with which he was charged in the instant case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fatzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.