United States v. Ronald A. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting transcripts with “a proper cautionary instruction . . . that the tapes were the true evidence and that the transcripts were to be used only for clarification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).