Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/27/1990
Trondson v. Janikula
Citations
- 458 N.W.2d 679
- 1990 Minn. LEXIS 220
- 1990 WL 103714
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing where a contract is ambiguous, the district court’s resolution of ambiguity is treated as a finding of fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-13· cited 254×
- Wessels, Arnold & Henderson v. National Medical Waste, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1995-09-07· cited 127×
- Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-22· cited 72×
- Joseph W. Michalski, Jeanette Michalski, Robert G. Michalski, Paulette R. Michalski v. Bank of America Arizona, an Arizona CorporationEighth Circuit· 1995-10-05· cited 46×
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-07-03· cited 43×
- In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-08-01· cited 43×
- Savela v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-11-23· cited 33×
- Jacobs v. Pickands Mather & Co.Eighth Circuit· 1991-05-16· cited 33×
- In re the Marriage of: Becki Anne Suleski, f/k/a Becki Anne Rupe v. Ryan Michael RupeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-10-20· cited 26×
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-06-12· cited 25×
- Roloff v. Taste of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-08-11· cited 21×
- Barry v. BarryEighth Circuit· 1996-04-19· cited 20×
- Stowell v. Cloquet Co-Op Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-01-16· cited 20×
- In re RFC & Rescap Liquidating Trust ActionD. Maine· 2018-08-15· cited 20×
- Kellen v. MathiasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-07-12· cited 15×
- Red River State Bank v. ReiersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 15×
- Bailey v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-08-10· cited 13×
- LaSociete Generale Immobiliere v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyEighth Circuit· 1994-12-22· cited 12×
- Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-07-15· cited 9×
- Santillan v. MartineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-04-08· cited 9×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-01-30· cited 109×
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-30· cited 106×
- Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-02-16· cited 57×
- Marks v. City of TucumcariNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 36×
- CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-05-20· cited 30×
- Gagne v. HobanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-06-28· cited 16×
- Lamm v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1905-07-14· cited 11×
- Kurz v. GramhillSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-07-28· cited 3×
- Trondson v. JanikulaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-10-10· cited 1×
Other cases named Trondson v. Janikula
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.