Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 4/19/1996

Barry v. Barry

Citations

  • 78 F.3d 375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that authority to supplement a record is rarely exercised and represents a narrow exception to the general rule that appellate courts consider only evidentiary materials before the trial court at the time summary judgment is granted
  • noting this court considers only evidentiary materials before the trial court when the summary judgment ruling was made
  • granting motion to strike and stating that \only evidentiary materials that were before the trial court at the time the . . . ruling was made\ would be considered
  • “The question of when discovery could or should have reasonably been made is one of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.