Jacobs v. Pickands Mather & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a two-year delay in filing a Rule 60(b) motion without plausible justification for delay was not reasonable
• affirming denial of Rule 60(b) motion when motion was not filed within a reasonable time
• finding two year delay in filing Rule 60(b) motion is not within reasonable time where there is no plausible justification for the delay
• considering whether motions to vacate beyond a year after entry were filed in a reasonable time
• “[T]he timeliness of the motion is measured as of the point in time when the moving party has grounds to make such a motion, regardless of the time that has elapsed since the entry of judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).