· 12/6/2000
Richard Ruiz and Foundation Anchoring Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. A.B. Chance Company
Citations
- 234 F.3d 654
- 57 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1161
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 31116
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the temptation to engage in impermissible hindsight is especially strong with seemingly simple mechanical inventions
- explaining that the temptation to engage in impermissible hindsight is especially strong with seemingly simple mechanical inventions
- explaining that the temptation to engage in impermissible hindsight is especially strong with seemingly simple mechanical inventions
- remanding for determination of whether testimony that claimed invention was \easy to install\ and \low cost\ established motivation to combine
- remanding for determination of whether testimony that claimed invention was “easy to install” and “low cost” established motivation to combine
- explaining that “secondary considerations, when present, must be considered in determining obviousness”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Michel, Rader
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.