Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s application of the law of the case doctrine is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• holding that any general remarks made by appellate court about who was the “prevailing party” constituted dicta which failed to trigger the law of case doctrine
• holding that any general remarks made by appellate court about who was the “prevailing party” constituted dicta which failed to trigger the law of case doctrine
• noting that the law of the case doctrine applies to issues “decided explicitly or by necessary implication in [the] previous disposition”
• explaining that the law of the case doctrine encompasses issues 19 decided “by necessary implication”
• explaining that for the doctrine to apply, the issue must have been explicitly or necessarily decided in the prior decision, and that the application of the doctrine is discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).