In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendant plan’s interpretation arbitrary and capricious where it argued that the word “and” should be interpreted as “or”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).