W.D. New York· 3/13/1991
Tranello v. Frey
Citations
- 758 F. Supp. 841
- 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1601
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3394
- 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,883
- 55 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 699
- 1991 WL 37679
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument by assistant district attorney that there was a property interest in continued employment
- “Government attorneys, because they are attorneys must advocate the positions of and counsel the government officials for whom they work”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Richard L. Britt and Timothy Jackson, Jr. v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc., James E. Hamilton v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1992-12-15· cited 76×
- Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 1997-04-11· cited 64×
- Regan v. BoogertmanSecond Circuit· 1993-01-26· cited 36×
- Mummelthie v. City of Mason City, IowaN.D. Iowa· 1995-01-09· cited 32×
- Jungels v. State University College of New YorkW.D. New York· 1996-04-02· cited 25×
- Tranello v. FreySecond Circuit· 1992-05-01· cited 22×
- Gregor v. DerwinskiW.D. New York· 1996-01-05· cited 21×
- Wanner v. State of Kan.D. Kansas· 1991-06-28· cited 13×
- Reed v. Town of BranfordD. Connecticut· 1996-12-13· cited 11×
- Purdy v. Town of GreenburghS.D. New York· 2001-09-26· cited 11×
- Kizer v. Curators of University of MissouriE.D. Missouri· 1993-03-25· cited 10×
- Kauffman v. Kent State UniversityN.D. Ohio· 1993-02-17· cited 9×
- Corrigan v. Rhode Island, Department of Business RegulationD. Rhode Island· 1993-04-14· cited 9×
- Catone v. SpielmannN.D. New York· 1997-06-19· cited 4×
- Hogan v. PatakiN.D. New York· 1997-01-15· cited 2×
- Britt v. Grocers Supply Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1992-12-09
- Hamilton v. Grocers Supply Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1992-12-09
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court· 1976-06-28· cited 4,553×
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court· 1980-03-31· cited 1,881×
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court· 1978-02-22· cited 1,535×
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1983-03-29· cited 1,284×
- Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,236×
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,006×
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1987-03-26· cited 365×
- David T. Thompson and Thompson Communications Companies, Inc. v. Davor G. GjivojeSecond Circuit· 1990-02-20· cited 305×
- Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, DefendantSeventh Circuit· 1981-08-14· cited 297×
- Arnaldo Jimenez Fuentes v. Honorable Jaime Torres GaztambideFirst Circuit· 1986-09-24· cited 241×
- Donald C. Tomczak v. The City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1985-06-17· cited 203×
- Lamont Warren v. Joseph L. Dwyer, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer in the Police Dept. Of Hartford, CtSecond Circuit· 1990-06-25· cited 185×
- Wilson v. RennerSupreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 151×
- Stott v. HaworthFourth Circuit· 1990-10-04· cited 136×
- Ma v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 104×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.