Richard L. Britt and Timothy Jackson, Jr. v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc., James E. Hamilton v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “speculation and belief” are “insufficient to create a fact issue as to pretext”
• noting that speculation and belief are insufficient to create a fact issue regarding pretext
• Stating remarks from striking employees about why they were replaced, without evidence of a pretext, were not enough to create genuine issue
• “[T]he question is not whether the plaintiff proves pretext, but rather the plaintiff raises a genuine issue of material fact regarding pretext.”
• “[T]he question is not whether the plaintiff proves pretext, but rather the plaintiff raises a genuine issue of material fact regarding pretext.”
• \[T]raditional preemption analysis does not apply in a conflict between two federal statutes.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).