Skip to main content
· 9/26/2001

Purdy v. Town of Greenburgh

Citations

  • 166 F. Supp. 2d 850
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15563
  • 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1223
  • 2001 WL 1154040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) does not preempt a § 1983 action for age discrimination when the § 1983 claim is based on substantive rights distinct from those established by the ADEA, such as the right to equal protection of the laws
  • explaining in ADEA case that “a plaintiff may through statistical evidence establish a pattern or practice of ... failing to hire people over forty ... from which an inference of age discrimination may be drawn”
  • “Because age is not a suspect class, the Equal Protection Clause only requires a rational basis for discrimination on the basis of age.”
  • “Here, there is no dispute that age discrimination is contrary to clearly established federal law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.