Skip to main content

Tracy v. State

Citations

  • 573 A.2d 38
  • 319 Md. 452
  • 1990 Md. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that co-defendants had engaged in “one continuous conspiratorial relationship. . . to commit robbery and murder,” notwithstanding a later-changed agreement as to who would carry out the acts
  • remanding with instructions to vacate judgment of conviction on conspiracy to commit robbery with deadly weapon
  • noting that the defendant was not prejudiced by the joint trial on all the charges — even those added less than a month before trial — because “the charges were so interrelated and bound together by a common scheme that the evidence as to all charges was mutually admissible”
  • “‘[a] defendant can lose his rights under joinder and severance law by failing to assert them in a timely fashion’”
  • “ ‘[a] defendant can lose his rights under joinder and severance law by failing to assert them in a timely fashion’ ”
  • only one sentence can be imposed for common law conspiracy no matter how many criminal acts the conspirators have agreed to commit; unit of prosecution is the agreement or combination rather than each of its criminal objectives

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Chasanow, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.