Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/14/1990
Frazier v. State
Citations
- 569 A.2d 684
- 318 Md. 597
- 1990 Md. LEXIS 27
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Legislature may impose punishment for conduct with aggravated circumstances under separate statutory offenses, even where offenses might otherwise be deemed the same under the required evidence test
- holding that the Legislature may impose punishment for conduct with aggravated circumstances under separate statutory offenses, even where offenses might otherwise be deemed the same under the required evidence test
- observing that “the likely prejudice caused by the joinder [of similar offenses, tried before a jury], must be balanced against the considerations of economy and efficiency in judicial administration”
- noting that clear legislative intent mandating separate punishments is dispositive of the Blockburger test
- concluding, after review of legislative history, that legislature did not intend to prohibit separate penalties for crimes of (1) carrying a handgun and (2) possession of a revolver by one previously convicted of a crime of violence
- finding limiting jury instructions adequate to ensure the jury's proper consideration of a defendant's prior conviction in a felon-in-possession charge on a multi-count indictment arising from a single incident
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-10-07· cited 110×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-15· cited 62×
- Holbrook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-05· cited 53×
- Wieland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-28· cited 45×
- Oglesby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-02-23· cited 45×
- Jones v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-15· cited 40×
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-09-08· cited 40×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-02-26· cited 39×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-24· cited 39×
- In Re Montrail M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-24· cited 38×
- Middleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-28· cited 35×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-27· cited 35×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-14· cited 34×
- Tracy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-08· cited 34×
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-10-11· cited 32×
- Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-30· cited 31×
- Marks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-05· cited 31×
- Eldridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-10· cited 29×
- Manuel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-11-14· cited 24×
- Ogonowski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-05-06· cited 20×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-05-05· cited 189×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-01· cited 149×
- State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-07· cited 137×
- McKnight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-06· cited 101×
- Whack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-07-07· cited 80×
- Grandison v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1986-10-06· cited 75×
- Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-10-19· cited 40×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-04· cited 31×
- Evans v. McCotterSupreme Court· 1986-12-03· cited 25×
- Graves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-22· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.