Erman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant who neither moved for severance and mistrial nor joined in his co-defendant’s motion waived right to raise issue on appeal
• “Thus before one is disqualified as a witness under the provisions of § 9-104, he must be convicted of the crime of perjury.”
• “[P]rejudice occurred when non-mutually admissible evidence was introduced in a degree so great as to render the several limiting instructions repetitive, mundane, and meaningless, so as to fall upon deaf ears.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).