Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/8/2008
Simpson v. Simpson
Citations
- 660 S.E.2d 274
- 377 S.C. 519
- 2008 S.C. App. LEXIS 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the judge's \remarks about her concern for not disclosing the information at the beginning of the hearing do not show any bias or prejudice but instead show her sensitivity to any apprehension each side might have in her ability to make a fair and impartial ruling in the case\
- finding the judge’s “remarks about her concern for not disclosing the information at the beginning of the hearing do not show any bias or prejudice but instead show her sensitivity to any apprehension each side might have in her ability to make a fair and impartial ruling in the case”
- \South Carolina law is clear that '[n]o order is final until it is written and entered'\ (quoting Corbin v. Kohler Co., 351 S.C. 613, 620, 571 S.E.2d 92, 96 (Ct. App. 2002))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Short, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Davis v. Parkview ApartmentsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-08-06· cited 35×
- Segars-Andrews v. Judicial Merit Selection CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-03-23· cited 20×
- Brailsford v. BrailsfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-11-14· cited 7×
- Graceland Care Center of New Albany, LLC v. Teresa HamletMississippi Supreme Court· 2017-11-02
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tennant v. Marion Health Care Foundation, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 308×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 145×
- Corbin v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-10-07· cited 64×
- Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court· 2006-01-31· cited 39×
- Millen v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 2006-12-21· cited 37×
- Townsend v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-08-19· cited 32×
- Christensen v. MikellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-09-23· cited 23×
- Doe v. HoweCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-12-19· cited 23×
- In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge TurneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-12-08· cited 22×
- Lyvers v. LyversCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-10· cited 14×
- McBeth v. Nissan Motor Corp. USAD. South Carolina· 1996-04-12· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.