Skip to main content

Bailey v. Bailey

Citations

  • 441 S.E.2d 325
  • 312 S.C. 454
  • 1994 S.C. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding attorneys lacked standing to intervene in divorce action because their interest in fees was peripheral
  • noting exclusive jurisdiction over a fee dispute vests in the Board upon a client's consent to be bound

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finney, Chandler, Toal, Howard, Rushing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.