Skip to main content
· 5/12/1981

Tomczuk v. Alvarez

Citations

  • 184 Conn. 182
  • 439 A.2d 935
  • 1981 Conn. LEXIS 520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that use of charge is within discretion of trial judge but expressing strong disapproval of charge and noting that it serves no useful purpose and confuses and distracts jury
  • holding that use of charge is within discretion of trial judge but expressing strong disapproval of charge and noting that it serves no useful purpose and confuses and distracts jury
  • Court's curative charge nullified any prejudicial impact of improper portions of opposing counsel's argument regarding plaintiff's settlement with codefendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aementano, Bogdanski, Petees, Healey, Armentano, Weight

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.