State v. Maresca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he court did not err in failing to define ‘maintain,’ ‘assist,’ and ‘custodian,’ all terms which were used and might be understood in their ordinary meaning”
• court did not err in failing to define terms that may be understood in their ordinary meaning
• “[n]or ... did the court err in refusing to charge the jury on the statutory definition of the word ‘intentionally,’ which has not been shown to have been used in anything other than its ordinary meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).