Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/19/1972
Birgel v. Heintz
Citations
- 163 Conn. 23
- 301 A.2d 249
- 1972 Conn. LEXIS 747
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘[p]roper compensation for personal injuries cannot be computed by mathematical formula, and the law furnishes no precise rule for [such an] assessment’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: House, Ryan, Shapiro, Loiselle, Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-08· cited 232×
- Buckman v. People Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-09-01· cited 216×
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-19· cited 206×
- Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1992-11-25· cited 188×
- Coelho v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-06-28· cited 167×
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-21· cited 166×
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-22· cited 143×
- Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-04-20· cited 119×
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-02· cited 117×
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-02· cited 114×
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 106×
- Palomba v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-06-21· cited 98×
- Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-07· cited 94×
- Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-15· cited 88×
- State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-07-24· cited 87×
- Riccio v. AbateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-01-09· cited 78×
- Bartholomew v. SchweizerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-03-12· cited 72×
- Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-11-23· cited 67×
- Kiniry v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-04-14· cited 63×
- Sanders v. Officers Club of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-05-28· cited 63×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1941-03-04· cited 172×
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-05-21· cited 118×
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-11-01· cited 106×
- Vogel v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-08-01· cited 75×
- Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1970-07-07· cited 67×
- Desmarais v. PintoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-01-08· cited 64×
- Rood v. RussoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-03-24· cited 62×
- Lavieri v. UlyssesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1962-04-05· cited 59×
- Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-07-19· cited 56×
- Katz v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-06-05· cited 54×
- McWilliams v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1954-01-12· cited 53×
- McKirdy v. CascioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1955-01-25· cited 52×
- Zullo v. ZulloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-05-06· cited 47×
- Fairbanks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-07-24· cited 46×
- Slabinski v. DixSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-04-08· cited 44×
- Facey v. MerkleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1959-01-27· cited 41×
- Allen v. GiulianoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1957-10-29· cited 40×
- Giambartolomei v. Rocky DeCarlo & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-06-12· cited 39×
- Butler v. SteckSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1959-01-20· cited 39×
- Martino v. PalladinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-06-25· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.