Pisel v. Stamford Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the admission in a medical malpractice action of a videotape showing the plaintiff’s daily activities at the time of trial
• “[t]he purpose of [§ 19a-17b] is to keep peer review studies, discussions and deliberations confidential”
• ‘‘[as] long as harm of the general nature as that which occurred is foreseeable there is a basis for liability even though the manner in which the accident happens is unusual, bizarre or unforeseeable’’
• ‘‘[as] long as harm of the general nature as that which occurred is foreseeable there is a basis for liability even though the manner in which the accident happens is unusual, bizarre or unforeseeable’’
• hospital liable for failing properly to observe and monitor patient
• hospital liable for failing properly to observe and monitor patient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).