Ninth Circuit· 9/14/2018

Tomas Bartolome v. Jefferson Sessions, III

Citations

904 F.3d 803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “we must uphold the IJ’s conclusion . . . unless, based on the evidence, any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
holding that substantial evidence supported IJ’s denial of withholding of removal when gangs targeted petitioner “because they perceived him to have money,” not “based on a protected ground”
holding that to satisfy the objective part of the reasonable-fear inquiry a petitioner must present “a good reason to fear future persecution based on credible, direct, and specific evidence in the record”
concluding that petitioner’s due process allegations in reasonable fear proceedings lacked merit
noting that the IJ stated he considered all of the evidence and finding “no basis to assume” otherwise
explaining that an IJ is not required to “address all of the evidence and claims specifically” in reviewing reasonable fear determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.