ZHIQIANG HU v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that officers accused the petitioner of acting against the government and the Communist party
• remanding where a meaningful review of the agency’s decision could not be conducted because the agency failed to provide a reasoned explanation of its decision
• remanding CAT claim where the BIA failed to provide a reasoned explanation of its decision
• granting petition where petitioner organized 100 laid-off workers to protest in front of city government building, was accused of acting against Communist party, and was detained and beaten
• remanding because the nexus inquiry and the persecution inquiry are “distinct”
• remanding because the nexus inquiry and the persecution inquiry are “distinct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).