Ninth Circuit· 5/1/2017
Silvia Ayala v. Jefferson Sessions
Citations
- 855 F.3d 1012
- 2017 WL 1541961
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7673
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the court has jurisdiction to review an IJ’s reasonable fear determination arising under the reinstatement of an expedited removal order
- holding that where a petitioner’s membership in particular social group of family is at least “a reason” for mistreatment, it is sufficient to meet the nexus requirement for withholding of removal
- holding that a petitioner who faced extortion for both economic reasons and because of membership in a family had established that membership in the family was \a reason\ for the persecution
- noting that extortion qualifies as past persecution only when the extortion is motivated by a protected ground
- noting that a motion to reopen may be granted only if the evidence presented is new, material, and newly available
- holding that threats and extortion could constitute persecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, Wardlaw, Korman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Doris Rodriguez-Zuniga v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2023-06-07· cited 265×
- Ninoska Suate-Orellana v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-05-07· cited 119×
- Tomas Bartolome v. Jefferson Sessions, IIINinth Circuit· 2018-09-14· cited 113×
- Padilla-Ramirez v. BibleNinth Circuit· 2017-07-06· cited 48×
- Israel Alvarado-Herrera v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-04-13· cited 43×
- Jose Alonso-Juarez v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2023-09-08· cited 40×
- Alfaro Manzano v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-06-25· cited 24×
- Martinez v. SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-07-20· cited 17×
- Kami Etemadi v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-09-09· cited 16×
- Manjinder Singh v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2020-12-09· cited 9×
- Raul Padilla-Ramirez v. Daniel BibleNinth Circuit· 2017-07-06· cited 7×
- Osmani Valencia Martinez v. Jefferson SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-07-20· cited 4×
- Baldemar Zuniga v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-08-20· cited 2×
- Osmani Valencia Martinez v. Jefferson SessionsNinth Circuit· 2017-10-12
- Raul Padilla-Ramirez v. Daniel BibleNinth Circuit· 2018-02-15
- Baldemar Zuniga v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-12-26
- A-BBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2021-07-01
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2003-03-04· cited 1,781×
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 1,703×
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court· 2011-03-01· cited 1,451×
- Mauro Antonio Cano-Merida v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2002-11-22· cited 772×
- Raul Barajas-Romero v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2017-01-18· cited 749×
- Parussimova v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2009-01-26· cited 543×
- Nelson Andrade-Garcia v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2016-07-07· cited 380×
- Teresita Moral BORJA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentNinth Circuit· 1999-04-30· cited 327×
- Garcia De Rincon v. Department of Homeland SEC.Ninth Circuit· 2008-08-21· cited 173×
- Jose J. Padilla-Padilla Guadalupe D. Padilla-Enriquez Adela Enriquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-09-13· cited 146×
- Felix Flores Rios v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2015-12-01· cited 115×
- Morgan v. GonzalesNinth Circuit· 2007-07-26· cited 75×
- Alejandro Ortiz-Alfaro v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-27· cited 71×
- Popa v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2009-07-06· cited 70×
- Yepremyan v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-08-10· cited 21×
- Daas v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2010-08-24· cited 21×
- Francisca Morales De Soto v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2016-05-31· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.