D.C. Circuit· 4/27/1984
Tolson v. United States
Citations
- 235 U.S. App. D.C. 396
- 732 F.2d 998
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Section 1292(b) is meant to be applied in relatively few situations and should not be read as a significant incursion on the traditional federal policy against piecemeal appeals.”
- \ Section 1292(b) is meant to be applied in relatively few situations and should not be read as a significant incursion on the traditional federal policy against piecemeal appeals.\
- \[w]e offer no universal formulas\
- “[w]e offer no universal formulas”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, MacKinnon, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Ricki Helfer, Chairman, FdicD.C. Circuit· 1997-12-23· cited 376×
- Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1994-06-21· cited 197×
- Samaad v. City of DallasFifth Circuit· 1991-08-23· cited 128×
- Martin John Beattie v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1984-12-31· cited 112×
- Gerardi v. PelulloThird Circuit· 1994-02-03· cited 99×
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Energy Policy Development GroupDistrict of Columbia· 2002-11-26· cited 63×
- Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama· 2006-08-25· cited 55×
- Kennecott Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1991-06-14· cited 53×
- Tinker Investment & Mortgage Corp. v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-04-19· cited 52×
- Precision American Corp. v. Leasing Service Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1987-03-27· cited 51×
- First American Corp. v. Al-NahyanDistrict of Columbia· 1996-11-26· cited 45×
- Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company v. American Cyanamid CompanySeventh Circuit· 1988-11-07· cited 44×
- United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. Pittston Co.District of Columbia· 1992-04-29· cited 40×
- Liberty Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City, N.A. v. RogalinSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1996-02-06· cited 34×
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2005-03-08· cited 34×
- Bacadam Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. KennardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1998-08-28· cited 30×
- Automatic Liquid Packaging, Inc. v. Jack E. DominikSeventh Circuit· 1988-07-27· cited 27×
- Young v. SandlinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1997-09-26· cited 25×
- Sussex Drug Products v. Kanasco, Ltd.Third Circuit· 1990-12-19· cited 23×
- Tolson v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1984-04-27· cited 18×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court· 1976-03-23· cited 988×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 986×
- Gas-A-Car, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. American Petrofina, Inc., and American Petrofina Company of TexasTenth Circuit· 1973-09-19· cited 97×
- Page v. PreisserEighth Circuit· 1978-10-02· cited 78×
- John C. Chacon, Jr. v. Richard A. Babcock, United States Marine Corps and United States of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1981-02-17· cited 75×
- Gold Seal Co. v. Weeks, Secretary of CommerceD.C. Circuit· 1954-01-07· cited 60×
- Purdy Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Champion Home Builders Co., and Tamarack HomesNinth Circuit· 1979-04-16· cited 39×
- Mr. And Mrs. Neal Schexnaydre, Sr. v. The Travelers Insurance CompanyFifth Circuit· 1976-02-26· cited 27×
- Theodore R. Bergstrom and Thermograte Enterprises, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. And Cardinal Foundry & Supply CompanyEighth Circuit· 1979-06-14· cited 11×
Other cases named Tolson v. United States
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.