Scrushy v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘It is .uneconomical for an appellate court to review facts on an appeal following a Rule 54(b
• “Whether there was ‘no just reason for delay’ is an inquiry committed'to the sound discretion of the trial court, and, as to that issue, we must determine whether the trial court exceeded its discretion.”
• 'Whether there was \no just reason for delay\ is an inquiry committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and, as to that issue, we must determine whether the trial court exceeded its discretion.'
• 'Whether there was \no just reason for delay\ is an inquiry committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and, as to that issue, we must determine whether the trial court exceeded its discretion.'
• 'Whether there was \no just reason for delay\ is an inquiry committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and, as to that issue, we must determine whether the trial court exceeded its discretion.'
• 'Whether there was \no just reason for delay\ is an inquiry committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and, as to that issue, we must determine whether the trial court exceeded its discretion.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).