Skip to main content
· 3/27/1987

Precision American Corp. v. Leasing Service Corp.

Citations

  • 505 So. 2d 380
  • 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court's Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., certification of its partial summary judgment on a single claim, leaving open the amount of damages, was erroneous; therefore, the appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, because there was no final judgment
  • `Rule 54(b) does not authorize the entry of final judgment on part of a single claim'; citing Tolson v. United States , 732 F.2d 998 , 999 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  • \Rule 54(b) does not authorize the entry of final judgment on part of a single claim\; citing Tolson v. United States , 732 F.2d 998 , 999 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  • Rule 54(b) did not create a final and appealable judgment where the trial court adjudicated only one portion of the claim for damages on a counterclaim, \while reserving determination on the balance of the counterclaim\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.