Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Energy Policy Development Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying stay pending appeal in part given “harm to both the plaintiffs and the public” where “Congress, Executive agencies, and the public have been debating” government policy “without the benefit of the information sought by plaintiffs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).