Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/3/2011
Tolson v. State
Citations
- 29 A.3d 1059
- 201 Md. App. 512
- 2011 Md. App. LEXIS 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when a court 8 alters a sentence without authority to do so, that alteration is a “nullity”
- circuit court does not acquire jurisdiction to reconsider sentence if a motion is not timely filed within 90 days of sentencing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krauser, Meredith, Thieme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-24· cited 76×
- Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-16· cited 75×
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-20· cited 49×
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-11-04· cited 41×
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-11-10· cited 34×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-15· cited 15×
- Benedict v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-09-08· cited 10×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-19· cited 8×
- Nimon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-10· cited 5×
- State v. KarmandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-12-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.