Greco v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[tjo interpret rules of procedure, [the court] use[s] the same principles and canons of construction as are used to interpret statutes”
• noting that our goal is to give statutes their “most reasonable interpretation, in accord with logic and common sense, and to avoid a construction not otherwise evident by the words actually used”
• noting that our goal is to give statutes their “most reasonable interpretation, in accord with logic and common sense, and to avoid a construction not otherwise evident by the words actually used”
• noting how Maryland Rule 4-345 had been modified to abrogate the holding in State v. Sayre, 314 Md. 559, 552 A.2d 553 (1989), regarding mistakes in announcing sentence
• analyzing Rule 4-345(b), the predecessor to Rule 4-345(e), in juxtaposition to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b
• interpreting prior Maryland case law to determine the meaning of the word “imposition” in the context of Maryland Rule 4-345(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).