Skip to main content

Tobias v. State

Citations

  • 378 A.2d 698
  • 37 Md. App. 605
  • 1977 Md. App. LEXIS 336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating the admission of videotape recordings the same as the admission of photographic [i.e. physical] evidence
  • “We find no abuse of discretion in allowing the authenticating witness to identify the people shown in the video tape . . . The jury saw the tape, and could judge for itself what it showed and whether [the detective’s] identifications were accurate”
  • “We find no abuse of discretion in allowing the authenticating witness to identify the people shown in the video tape . . . The jury saw the tape, and could judge for itself what it showed and whether [the detective’s] identifications were accurate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Melvin, Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.