Seventh Circuit· 4/28/2017
Timothy Ozinga v. Thomas E. Price
Citations
- 855 F.3d 730
- 2017 WL 1526396
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that when the government revises or replaces a challenged regulation, “the source of the plaintiff’s prospective injury has been removed, and there is no ‘effectual relief whatever’ that the court can order” (collecting cases)
- “When a plaintiff’s complaint is focused on a particular stat- ute, regulation, or rule and seeks only prospective relief, the case becomes moot when the government repeals, revises, or replaces the challenged law and thereby removes the complained-of defect.”
- “When a plaintiff’s complaint is focused 6 No. 23-1792 on a particular statute, regulation, or rule and seeks only pro- spective relief, the case becomes moot when the government repeals, revises, or replaces the challenged law and thereby removes the complained-of defect.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Rovner, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Speech First, Inc. v. Timothy L. KilleenSeventh Circuit· 2020-07-28· cited 196×
- Unite Here Local 1 v. Hyatt CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2017-07-06· cited 115×
- Freedom From Religion Fdn v. AbbottFifth Circuit· 2023-01-27· cited 26×
- Tina Gerlach v. Todd RokitaSeventh Circuit· 2024-03-06· cited 24×
- N.J. v. David SonnabendSeventh Circuit· 2022-06-15· cited 13×
- Driftless Area Land Conservancy v. Rural Utilities ServiceSeventh Circuit· 2023-07-19· cited 6×
- National Wildlife Refuge Association v. American Transmission Company LLCSeventh Circuit· 2023-07-19
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-04-30· cited 2,306×
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 1,710×
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court· 2013-01-09· cited 1,353×
- Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1993-06-14· cited 1,126×
- City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-23· cited 1,119×
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court· 1895-11-25· cited 1,019×
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. GomezSupreme Court· 2016-01-20· cited 967×
- Hall v. BealsSupreme Court· 1969-12-08· cited 608×
- Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 435×
- Cyril Korte v. HHSSeventh Circuit· 2013-11-08· cited 361×
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-06-30· cited 360×
- Princeton University v. SchmidSupreme Court· 1982-01-13· cited 218×
- Federation of Advertising Industry Representatives, Inc., an Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2003-04-25· cited 134×
- Chicago Observer, Inc. v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1991-04-25· cited 77×
- Zubik v. BurwellSupreme Court· 2016-05-16· cited 43×
- William Grote, III v. Kathleen SebeSeventh Circuit· 2013-02-12· cited 32×
- University of Notre Dame v. Sylvia Mathews BurwellSeventh Circuit· 2015-05-19· cited 31×
- Grace Schools v. Sylvia Mathews BurwellSeventh Circuit· 2015-09-04· cited 30×
- City of Milwaukee v. John R. Block, Secretary of AgricultureSeventh Circuit· 1987-07-14· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.