Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 4/28/2017

Timothy Ozinga v. Thomas E. Price

Citations

  • 855 F.3d 730
  • 2017 WL 1526396
  • 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that when the government revises or replaces a challenged regulation, “the source of the plaintiff’s prospective injury has been removed, and there is no ‘effectual relief whatever’ that the court can order” (collecting cases)
  • “When a plaintiff’s complaint is focused on a particular stat- ute, regulation, or rule and seeks only prospective relief, the case becomes moot when the government repeals, revises, or replaces the challenged law and thereby removes the complained-of defect.”
  • “When a plaintiff’s complaint is focused 6 No. 23-1792 on a particular statute, regulation, or rule and seeks only pro- spective relief, the case becomes moot when the government repeals, revises, or replaces the challenged law and thereby removes the complained-of defect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Rovner, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.