Tina Gerlach v. Todd Rokita

Oral argument

• Argued

  36 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the two standards are the same
• \[T]he FBI has promulgated a rule . . . that exempts its [Central Records System] to the fullest permissible extent from the requirements of [5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)].\ (citing 28 C.F.R. § 16.96)
• “The [Privacy] Act provides two avenues of redress for violations of subsection (e)(5). . . . [T]he individual normally may bring suit under subsection (g)(1)(A)[, and t]he other means . . . is provided by subsection (g)(1)(C).”
• “Although both subsections (j) and (k) refer to ‘systems of records,’ we have previously held that 28 C.F.R. § 16.96, the FBI exemption regulation respecting its CRS, does not remove that entire filing system from the requirements of the Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).