Supreme Court· 6/16/2016
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 579 U.S. 162
- 195 L. Ed. 2d 334
- 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3921
- 136 S. Ct. 1969
- 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 254
- 84 U.S.L.W. 4416
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that even if an agency interpretation “could be owed Chevron deference, we do not defer to the agency when the statute is unambiguous”
- holding that Section 8127 is mandatory and requires the VA “to apply the Rule of Two to all contracting determinations and to award contracts to veteran-owned small businesses”
- holding that the exception applied because the contracts at issue would be fully performed is less than two years, a period \too short to complete judicial review of the lawfulness of the procurement.\
- observing that the “clause announc[ing] an objective . . . [did] not change the plain meaning of the operative clause”
- stating that \the word 'shall' usually connotes a requirement\ and equating \ shall \ with \ must \
- noting that “[w]hen a statute distinguishes between ‘may’ and ‘shall,’ it is generally clear that ‘shall’ imposes a mandatory duty”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
245 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Yajure HurtadoBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2025-09-05· cited 693×
- United States v. Erickson Meko CampbellEleventh Circuit· 2022-02-16· cited 404×
- United States v. Sanchez-GomezSupreme Court· 2018-05-14· cited 300×
- Speech First, Inc. v. Timothy L. KilleenSeventh Circuit· 2020-07-28· cited 196×
- Maine Community Health Options v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2020-04-27· cited 174×
- Surender Malhan v. Secretary United States DepartThird Circuit· 2019-09-18· cited 171×
- Intel Corp. Investment Policy Comm. v. SulymaSupreme Court· 2020-02-26· cited 145×
- Hayes v. DahkleSecond Circuit· 2020-10-05· cited 117×
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. United States Ex Rel. RigsbySupreme Court· 2016-12-06· cited 109×
- Planned Parenthood of Greater v. UshhsNinth Circuit· 2020-01-10· cited 88×
- Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. SandhuE.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-01-30· cited 76×
- Friends of the East Hampton Airport, Inc. v. Town of East HamptonSecond Circuit· 2016-11-04· cited 67×
- Ramon Jasso Arangure v. Matthew WhitakerSixth Circuit· 2018-12-18· cited 65×
- Matthew Brach v. Gavin NewsomNinth Circuit· 2022-06-15· cited 59×
- Mark Spell v. John EdwardsFifth Circuit· 2020-06-18· cited 58×
- Exby-Stolley v. Board of County CommissionersTenth Circuit· 2020-10-28· cited 56×
- CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.Supreme Court· 2020-03-30· cited 54×
- PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauD.C. Circuit· 2016-10-11· cited 51×
- In re 2016 Primary ElectionSixth Circuit· 2016-09-06· cited 48×
- New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2018-01-31· cited 48×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 3,515×
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.Supreme Court· 2013-01-09· cited 1,353×
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court· 2002-02-19· cited 1,044×
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court· 1983-05-31· cited 801×
- Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 670×
- OBB Personenverkehr AG v. SachsSupreme Court· 2015-12-01· cited 130×
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1889-11-18· cited 102×
- United States Ex Rel. Siegel v. ThomanSupreme Court· 1895-03-04· cited 69×
- Sharp Electronics Corporation v. ArmyFederal Circuit· 2013-02-22· cited 22×
- Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-11-27· cited 19×
- Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2014-06-03· cited 13×
Other cases named Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.