Federation of Advertising Industry Representatives, Inc., an Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that public university’s repeal of particular student-code rule rendered moot plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunction enjoining rule as violating First Amendment
• holding that “repeal of a contested ordinance moots a plaintiffs injunction request, absent evidence that the City plans to or already has reenacted the challenged law or one substantially similar”
• holding that the repeal of a contested ordinance moots an injunction request and noting that \[o]nly in cases where there is evidence that the repeal was not genuine has the [Supreme] Court refused to hold the case moot\
• holding that the repeal of a contested ordinance moots an injunction request and noting that “[o]nly in cases where there is evidence that the repeal was not genuine has the [Supreme] Court refused to hold the ease moot”
• noting that “repeal of a contested ordinance moots a plaintiffs injunction request, absent evidence that the [defendant] plans to or already has reenacted the challenged law or one substantially similar”
• finding that party was “precluded from resurrecting its damages claim” under law-of-the-case doctrine because district court denied damages claim and party did not raise issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).